Authorizing Subnational Constitutions in Transitional Federal States: South Africa, Democracy, and the Kwazulu-Natal Constitution

54 Pages Posted: 29 Oct 2013

See all articles by Jonathan L. Marshfield

Jonathan L. Marshfield

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

Not all federal systems permit their constituent units to adopt constitutions. This Article considers whether, and under what circumstances, subnational constitutions tend to contribute to the volatility or stability of their respective federal systems. By examining the role that subnational constitutions played in South Africa’s celebrated democratization, this Article observes that a transitional federal state can increase its flexibility and adaptability by merely authorizing subnational constitutions. The Article concludes that federal systems, particularly those undergoing fundamental change, can be better equipped to manage regime-threatening conflicts and perpetuate a democratic political culture if they permit constituent units to adopt constitutions.

Keywords: South Africa, democracy, democratic theory, state constitutional law, subnational constitutional law, federalism, comparative law, comparative constitutional law, transitional justice, emerging democracies, Africa, political identity, voter choice, public choice, Zulu, Kwa-Zulu, apartheid, IFP, ANC

Suggested Citation

Marshfield, Jonathan L., Authorizing Subnational Constitutions in Transitional Federal States: South Africa, Democracy, and the Kwazulu-Natal Constitution (2008). Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 41, p. 585-638, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2346407

Jonathan L. Marshfield (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

309 Village Dr.
Gainesville, FL 32611
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/jonathan-marshfield

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
63
Abstract Views
858
Rank
632,749
PlumX Metrics