Bias and Religious Truth-Seeking in Proselytization Restrictions: An Atypical Case Study of Singapore

8(1) Asian Journal of Comparative Law 1-65 (2013)

University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013/038

65 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2013 Last revised: 2 Jan 2014

See all articles by Jianlin Chen

Jianlin Chen

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School

Date Written: November 1, 2013

Abstract

Proselytisation restrictions are typically subjected to two objections. First, these restrictions curtail religious liberty and impede religious truth-seeking. Second, these restrictions tend to favour politically dominant religions and discriminate against minority religions. The restrictions on offensive religious propagation in Singapore thus present an interesting departure in which sanctioned religions are not politically marginalised religions, whereas protected religions include numerical minority religions that are socially, economically, and politically disadvantaged. This article utilises the atypical case study of Singapore to highlight the limitations of the two typical objections toward proselytisation restrictions. In particular, the emphasis on religious truth-seeking underpinning these objections is premised upon a distinct set of religious worldviews not shared by the majority of religions in Singapore. This article posits that if religious truthseeking is no longer the accepted normative goal, then there may be circumstances in which some limited and even-handed restrictions on offensive religious propagation are sufficiently justified on the grounds of social peace and harmony.

Keywords: Religion, Law, Singapore, Proselytization, Religious Propagation, Religious Discrimination, Religious Freedom

Suggested Citation

Chen, Jianlin, Bias and Religious Truth-Seeking in Proselytization Restrictions: An Atypical Case Study of Singapore (November 1, 2013). 8(1) Asian Journal of Comparative Law 1-65 (2013), University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013/038, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2367634

Jianlin Chen (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
787
Rank
402,244
PlumX Metrics