Less is More: Procedural Efficacy in Vindicating Civil Rights

71 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2014 Last revised: 30 Apr 2016

Date Written: April 5, 2016

Abstract

Eradicating discrimination is a lofty goal, and since the second half of the twentieth century, the US has largely relied upon the legal system to achieve this goal. Yet a great deal of scholarship suggests that the legal system may not always do a credible job. Scholars have documented multiple instances of discrimination laws’ inaccessibility to discrimination victims individually and inability to improve the labor market prospects of victims as a whole. Still missing from the literature, however, is an assessment of what separates effective discrimination laws from ineffective ones. This Article fills this gap, using both qualitative and quantitative methods to determine the types of enforcement mechanisms that successfully and systematically improve the labor market outcomes of individuals protected by discrimination laws. The Article takes advantage of jurisdictional variation in laws that prohibit weight-based employment discrimination, which create a natural experiment for testing what types of laws and what types of remedies lead to meaningful improvement in the employment outcomes of protected workers. Applying the lessons learned from the weight-discrimination context to employment discrimination law more generally, the Article concludes that the existence of civil rights legislation on the books does little good for a protected class if a jurisdiction fails to allocate resources to enforcement appropriately. The study provides a cautionary tale for advocacy groups that focus all their resources on lobbying for new civil rights protections; their purposes might be better served by devoting significant resources to facilitating representation and raising public awareness about existing civil rights laws.

Keywords: LGBT, personal appearance, weight, obesity, enforcement, law in action, employment discrimination

JEL Classification: J71, J78, K41, K42

Suggested Citation

Shinall, Jennifer Bennett, Less is More: Procedural Efficacy in Vindicating Civil Rights (April 5, 2016). Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 16-13, Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 16-24, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2396667 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2396667

Jennifer Bennett Shinall (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
150
Abstract Views
1,775
Rank
352,794
PlumX Metrics