The New Tobacco Products Directive and WTO Law: Much Ado About Nothing

21 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2014

See all articles by Lukasz Gruszczynski

Lukasz Gruszczynski

Kozminski University - School of Law; Hungarian Academy of Sciences CSS Institute for Legal Studies

Date Written: June 13, 2014

Abstract

The paper analyses compatibility of various regulatory mechanisms provided by the new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) with the requirements of WTO law, in particular those included in the TBT and TRIPS Agreement. After introducing basic provisions of the directive and summarizing the concerns that were raised by some WTO Members during meetings of the TBT Committee and the TRIPS Council, the paper discusses in more detail the merits of those claims. On that basis, it concludes that the concerns expressed by WTO Members are generally overstated and the most of the TPD provisions is WTO-compatible. The paper also notes that the significance of this conclusion goes beyond the specific context of the EU measure. The TPD introduces many innovative regulatory solutions that are at the forefront of contemporary tobacco control policy trends. This allows to conclude that WTO law, while imposing certain standards, generally does not stand against genuine tobacco control polices that are adopted in non-discriminatory manner.

Keywords: Tobacco Products Directive, TBT Agreement, TRIPS Agreement, tobacco and trade, FCTC, tobacco control policy

Suggested Citation

Gruszczynski, Lukasz, The New Tobacco Products Directive and WTO Law: Much Ado About Nothing (June 13, 2014). Fourth Biennial Global Conference of the Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Working Paper No. 2014/06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2450226

Lukasz Gruszczynski (Contact Author)

Kozminski University - School of Law ( email )

Jagiellonska 57-59 ST
Warsaw, 03-301
Poland

Hungarian Academy of Sciences CSS Institute for Legal Studies ( email )

Tóth Kálmán st. 4
Budapest, 1097
Hungary

HOME PAGE: http://https://jog.tk.mta.hu/en/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
149
Abstract Views
1,327
Rank
357,736
PlumX Metrics