Lead Jurisdiction Concepts: Towards Rationalizing Multiple Competition Policy Enforcement Procedures

Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, Vol. 19, No. 87, June 2014

27 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2014

Date Written: June 17, 2014

Abstract

Lead jurisdiction models represent one option how to extend and enhance contemporary interagency cooperation among competition policy regimes. They constitute a multilateral, case-related form of cooperation that is suited to effectively create a one-stop-shop for the prosecution of international cartels, the handling of cross-border mergers and acquisitions and the governance of international antitrust cases. Thus, lead jurisdiction models offer considerable economic benefits. However, they also entail several caveats. Three possible working problems and downside effects of lead jurisdiction models in international competition policy enforcement are discussed in this paper.

Keywords: international competition policy, lead jurisdiction models, international governance, interjurisdictional cooperation, interagency cooperation, competition economics, antitrust

JEL Classification: F02, F53, F55, K21, L40, D02

Suggested Citation

Budzinski, Oliver, Lead Jurisdiction Concepts: Towards Rationalizing Multiple Competition Policy Enforcement Procedures (June 17, 2014). Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, Vol. 19, No. 87, June 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2458663

Oliver Budzinski (Contact Author)

Ilmenau University of Technology ( email )

Ilmenau, D-98684
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/wth

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
1,309
Rank
410,556
PlumX Metrics