Shareholder Wealth Effects of Pooling-of-Interests Accounting: Evidence from the Sec's Restriction on Share Repurchases Following Pooling Transactions

40 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2000

See all articles by Joseph Weber

Joseph Weber

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 2000

Abstract

Existing research on pooling-of-interests accounting suggests that managers are willing to pay additional transaction costs and merger premiums to use pooling to increase future accounting net income. There is currently little evidence indicating whether the firm's shareholders benefit from managers' decisions to use pooling. This paper examines whether shareholders benefit from the use of pooling-of-interests, by focusing on the transactions that arise from a recent SEC regulation restricting firms' ability to repurchase shares following pooling transactions. The results suggest that shareholders do not consider the favorable financial reporting effects of pooling to be beneficial, when they are obtained at the cost of firms' share repurchase programs. These results should be of interest to the FASB in their continued attempts to regulate the use of pooling.

Keywords: Pooling-of-interest, SEC, FASB, Regulation, Share repurchases, Mergers, Acquisitions, Tradeoff, Event study, Accounting

JEL Classification: G34, G35, G38, M41, M44

Suggested Citation

Weber, Joseph Peter, Shareholder Wealth Effects of Pooling-of-Interests Accounting: Evidence from the Sec's Restriction on Share Repurchases Following Pooling Transactions (October 2000). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=246370 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.246370

Joseph Peter Weber (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management ( email )

100 Main Street
E62-416
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-4310 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
765
Abstract Views
4,881
Rank
61,268
PlumX Metrics