Nuance, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to Predictive Policing and Reasonable Suspicion

10 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2014 Last revised: 24 Mar 2015

See all articles by Fabio Arcila, Jr.

Fabio Arcila, Jr.

UIC-John Marshall Law School; Touro University - Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

Professor Arcila agrees with Professor Andrew Ferguson that predictive policing will likely be incorporated into Fourth Amendment law and that it will alter reasonable suspicion determinations. But Professor Arcila argues that such an outcome would perpetuate a larger deficiency in our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and should be avoided because it fails to adequately consider and respect a broader range of protected interests.

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, predictive policing, reasonable suspicion, Terry v. Ohio, imminence standards, corroboration requirements, constitutional safeguards

Suggested Citation

Arcila, Jr., Fabio, Nuance, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to Predictive Policing and Reasonable Suspicion (2014). 63 Emory L.J. Online 87 (2014), Touro Law Center Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 15-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2464257

Fabio Arcila, Jr. (Contact Author)

UIC-John Marshall Law School ( email )

315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Touro University - Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center ( email )

225 Eastview Drive
Central Islip, NY 11722
United States
(631) 761-7111 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
170
Abstract Views
1,040
Rank
320,051
PlumX Metrics