Market Discipline by Bank Creditors During the 2008-2010 Crisis

49 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2014

See all articles by Rosalind L. Bennett

Rosalind L. Bennett

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research

Vivian Hwa

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research

Myron L. Kwast

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research

Date Written: March 2011

Abstract

This paper shows that the liability classes most likely to exhibit evidence of market discipline during the recent financial crisis were uninsured depositors, insured depositors, and general creditors. We evaluate the FDIC’s expectations about losses to creditors at banks that failed between 2008 and 2010 to establish that these creditors expected to incur loss. Our empirical tests find evidence of quantity market discipline that tends to begin far enough in advance to signal to both banks and supervisors that corrective actions can and should be taken. Consistent with the literature, our results suggest that during the crisis, quantity discipline was relatively strong and price market discipline was relatively weak. Our findings support several policy implications for encouraging market discipline.

Keywords: bank failures, financial crisis, market discipline

JEL Classification: G01, G21, G28, G33, H12

Suggested Citation

Bennett, Rosalind L. and Hwa, Vivian and Kwast, Myron L., Market Discipline by Bank Creditors During the 2008-2010 Crisis (March 2011). FDIC Division of Insurance Research Paper No. 2014-03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2482356 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2482356

Rosalind L. Bennett (Contact Author)

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research ( email )

550 Seventeenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20057
United States
202-898-7160 (Phone)

Vivian Hwa

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research ( email )

550 17th Street NW
Washington, DC 20429
United States

Myron L. Kwast

FDIC, Division of Insurance and Research ( email )

550 17th Street NW
Washington, DC 20429
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
Abstract Views
1,173
Rank
386,565
PlumX Metrics