In the Supreme Court of the United States: Anthony Douglas Elonis, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent: On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

33 Pages Posted: 3 Oct 2014

See all articles by Erik Nielson

Erik Nielson

University of Richmond

Charis E. Kubrin

University of California, Irvine

Date Written: August 18, 2014

Abstract

This is an amicus brief on rap music for an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case (submitted via the University of Florida’s Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project).

The history and conventions of rap music, the heavily stigmatized artistic and often political genre of musical expression through which Petitioner Anthony Douglas Elonis conveyed much of the speech at issue in this case, illustrate why the Court should: a) require proof of the defendant-speaker’s subjective intent to threaten under both the First Amendment-based true threats doctrine and 18 U.S.C. § 875(c); and b) reverse the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. Elonis, 730 F.3d 321 (3d Cir. 2013).

Keywords: rap music, hip hop, Supreme Court

Suggested Citation

Nielson, Erik and Kubrin, Charis, In the Supreme Court of the United States: Anthony Douglas Elonis, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent: On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (August 18, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2503254 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2503254

Erik Nielson

University of Richmond ( email )

28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States

Charis Kubrin (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine ( email )

Department of Criminiology, Law and Society
Social Ecology II, Rm 3379
Irvine, CA 62697-3125
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
1,376
Rank
476,655
PlumX Metrics