Better Development Decision-Making: Applying International Human Rights Law to Neoclassical Economics
M.E. Salomon and C. Arnott, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 2014 Vol. 32, No. 1, 44–74,
Posted: 17 Jan 2015
Date Written: January 16, 2014
Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate that a human rights-compliant normative approach offers solutions to some of the specific areas of concern for economic decision-making in the context of development, as well as for meeting the requirements of human rights. The authors, an international lawyer and economist respectively, draw on the doctrines that inform international human rights law in the area of socio-economic rights and by providing a careful construction that meets the didactic demands of a cross-disciplinary inquiry, reveal how the externally-generated ethical criteria of international human rights law provide welfare economics with the justice-centered guidance it lacks, moving it beyond the conventional premises of economic efficiency and aggregate social utility. The merits of this study transcend that of academic pursuit: most international organisations favour mainstream economics with development economists adopting the value judgments and allocation efficiency principles of neoclassical welfare economics. Integrating the normative demands of human rights into mainstream economic thinking and decision-making may thus offer international development and financial institutions insights that help set alternative norms and value judgments that can act as an integral complement to welfare economic analysis.
Keywords: Economic Efficiency; Neoclassical Economics; Social Welfare Function; Value Judgments; Welfare Economics; Distribution; Socio-economic Rights; International Legal
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation