How Italian Colors Guts Private Antitrust Enforcement by Replacing it with Ineffective Forms of Arbitration

8 Pages Posted: 4 Feb 2015 Last revised: 11 Mar 2016

Date Written: April 16, 2015

Abstract

The recent US Supreme Court decision in American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant threatens to gut private antitrust enforcement in the United States by replacing it with ineffective forms of arbitration. The Court's logic that the right to pursue a claim does not include a right to prove it is incoherent. The notion that voluntary consent means arbitration provisions must benefit buyers ignores the fact that buyers have collective action problems that are what justify antitrust law in the first place.

Keywords: antitrust, arbitration, italian colors, class action, class arbitration

JEL Classification: K21, K40, K41, L40

Suggested Citation

Elhauge, Einer R., How Italian Colors Guts Private Antitrust Enforcement by Replacing it with Ineffective Forms of Arbitration (April 16, 2015). 38 FORDHAM INT’L LAW JOURNAL 771 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559386

Einer R. Elhauge (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
174
Abstract Views
1,564
Rank
313,819
PlumX Metrics