Trying Former and Incumbent High-Level State Officials, Suspected of Having Committed International Crimes -- Personal and Functional Immunity as a Procedural Bar to Foreign State Adjudicative Jurisdiction?

34 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2015 Last revised: 3 Mar 2015

See all articles by Remy Jorritsma

Remy Jorritsma

European Court of Human Rights

Date Written: August 31, 2010

Abstract

This essay tries to find the balance between the sovereignty equality of states and the desire to punish a state official’s heinous conduct by another state. Ultimately, the goal is to ascertain if and when former and incumbent high-level state officials, suspected of having committed international crimes, can be tried in foreign courts. Particular attention will be paid to the International Court of Justice's Judgment in the Arrest Warrant case and recent national court decisions in the cases of Pinochet and Bouterse.

Keywords: International law, immunity, ratione personae, ratione materiae, Arrest Warrant, International Court of Justice

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Jorritsma, Remy, Trying Former and Incumbent High-Level State Officials, Suspected of Having Committed International Crimes -- Personal and Functional Immunity as a Procedural Bar to Foreign State Adjudicative Jurisdiction? (August 31, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567614 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2567614

Remy Jorritsma (Contact Author)

European Court of Human Rights ( email )

Strasbourg, Alsace region
France

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
558
PlumX Metrics