The Making of Delegated and Implementing Acts: Legitimacy Beyond Inter-Institutional Balances

Carl Fredrik Bergström and Dominique Ritleng (eds) Law-Making by the EU Commission: The New System (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015)

26 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2015

Date Written: March 23, 2015

Abstract

The relative power of the Commission, the Parliament and the Council in the adoption of delegated and implementing acts, including the debate on the delimitation of the scope of these acts, has dominated the debate on the scheme of non-legislative acts introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.

This chapter argues that approaching decision-making procedures of delegated and implementing acts only from an institutional lens is normatively insufficient, in two respects. First, it is incongruous with the Treaty provisions on democracy: not only an inter-institutional perspective is insufficient to ensure the democratic legitimacy of delegated and implementing acts, but also it ignores the relationships between the makers of legal acts and the outer sphere composed of citizens and legally affected persons. Secondly, it also overlooks core functions of procedures that are relevant to ensure the legitimacy of public acts. Procedures are a means to rationalise public action, by channeling information, weighing competing interests, and allowing scrutiny of the choices made. If designed accordingly, procedures could concretise democracy as a Union founding principle also in the making of delegated and implementing acts.

Keywords: delegated acts, implementing acts, democracy, European Union, procedures

Suggested Citation

Mendes, Joana, The Making of Delegated and Implementing Acts: Legitimacy Beyond Inter-Institutional Balances (March 23, 2015). Carl Fredrik Bergström and Dominique Ritleng (eds) Law-Making by the EU Commission: The New System (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2583640

Joana Mendes (Contact Author)

Universite du Luxembourg ( email )

L-1511 Luxembourg
Luxembourg

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
625
Rank
402,244
PlumX Metrics