Rethinking the Application of IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts

42 Isr. L. Rev. 8 (2009)

38 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2015

See all articles by David Kretzmer

David Kretzmer

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The first step in application by treaty of IHL norms to non-international armed conflicts, adoption of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, 1949, was taken before the dramatic development of international human rights law (IHRL). The assumption was that unless international humanitarian law (IHL) norms were applied to such conflicts, the way States acted would be unrestrained by international law. With the development of IHRL this assumption is no longer valid. Application of IHL in such conflicts should therefore be re-examined The Article argues that moving away from IHL in non-international armed conflicts should be based on the following principles: 1. In cases other than international armed conflicts, the presumption should be that the prevailing international legal regime is the human rights regime, based as it is on a law-enforcement model of law, rather than an armed conflict model. 2. The only justification for departure from that regime and for action under the armed conflict model, should be that the level and scope of organized armed violence are such that the State cannot reasonably be expected to act in accordance with the law-enforcement model. The rule of thumb in deciding whether this test has been met could be the definition of non-international armed conflicts adopted in APII. 3. There should be a return to the notion of minimum humanitarian standards or fundamental standards of humanity, which apply to all Parties in all situations, whether armed conflict, internal violence, disturbances,tensions and public emergencies. 4. A State should not be allowed to employ the armed conflict model, without at least some of the norms of protection that this model affords Partiesin international armed conflicts. The ideal solution would be to demand that a State, which employs the armed conflict model has to draw the legal consequences and recognize as combatants those members of dissident forces who meet the substantive conditions of combatants under Article 4, paragraph 2 of Third Geneva Convention.

Keywords: IHL, international human rights law, armed conflicts, state, Kretzmer, Geneva Convention

Suggested Citation

Kretzmer, David, Rethinking the Application of IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts (2009). 42 Isr. L. Rev. 8 (2009), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2666425

David Kretzmer (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
235
Abstract Views
827
Rank
235,369
PlumX Metrics