Keeping an Eye on Iris: Risk and Income Solidarity in OECD Healthcare Systems

TranState Working Paper No. 191

26 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2015

See all articles by Achim Schmid

Achim Schmid

University of Bremen - CRC 597

Pascal Siemsen

University of Bremen - Centre for Social Policy Research (CeS)

Ralf Götze

University of Bremen - Centre for Social Policy Research (CeS)

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

In most wealthy democracies as represented by long-term OECD-members, healthcare systems have been established which guarantee access to a broad package of health services. However, healthcare financing involves varying distributive effects and builds on different concepts of solidarity. Healthcare researchers have examined these equity issues in healthcare financing measuring the progressivity of healthcare financing using micro-level data. Most notably, the ECuity-project published progressivity indices in some European countries and the US for the late 1980s and early 1990s. Not least due to the rather complex procedure involved with the evaluation of income and expenditure surveys, such indices have been rarely calculated since.

From these studies on redistributive effects, we know that the main modes of financing quite consistently correspond to different levels of progressivity. Moreover, financing modes reflect different concepts of solidarity. Therefore, we suggest an alternative indicator to explore equity issues in healthcare financing using aggregate spending and revenue data. The Index of Risk and Income Solidarity (IRIS) is based on the respective share of distinct modes of financing. We distinguish modes of financing which involve ex-ante redistribution of health risks from those which entail only ex-post redistribution or none at all. Further, we differentiate financing modes which are related to personal or household income from those which involve no income redistribution.

We assume an increase of risk solidarity as well as a decline of income solidarity in the OECD-world. First of all, new and costly medical technologies drive the demand for ex-ante redistribution of health risks. At the same time, hopes to increase efficiency of healthcare provision through forms of co-payments have been disappointed. The decline of income solidarity is expected as a result of global competition. In order to reduce labour costs, OECD countries substitute social security contributions by flat-rate premiums or general taxes. In the light of global competition, governments also tend to strengthen indirect taxes since it is far more difficult to shift consumption abroad. Finally, we assume that it is easier to legitimize rising tobacco or alcohol taxes if they are ear-marked for healthcare financing.

We examine these assumptions presenting time series of risk and income solidarity based on OECD health data, OECD revenue statistics and national aggregate data on healthcare financing. We cover eleven OECD countries: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK and the US. These countries reflect a broad spectrum of healthcare system types in the OECD-world. The observation period starts at the eve of the first oil crisis in the 1970s and ends at the onset of the Great Recession in 2009.

Keywords: solidarity, financing, redistribution, healthcare systems, indicator

JEL Classification: G22, H23, H51, I10, I18

Suggested Citation

Schmid, Achim and Siemsen, Pascal and Götze, Ralf, Keeping an Eye on Iris: Risk and Income Solidarity in OECD Healthcare Systems (2015). TranState Working Paper No. 191, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2684215 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2684215

Achim Schmid (Contact Author)

University of Bremen - CRC 597 ( email )

Linzer Str. 9a
Bremen, D-28359
Germany
+49 (0) 421 218-56631 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.sfb597.uni-bremen.de/homepages/schmid/index.php

Pascal Siemsen

University of Bremen - Centre for Social Policy Research (CeS) ( email )

Bremen
Germany

Ralf Götze

University of Bremen - Centre for Social Policy Research (CeS) ( email )

Bremen
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://zes-bremen.de

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
918
Rank
563,377
PlumX Metrics