All Press is Good Press: The News Media and the Incumbent Advantage in Judicial Elections

22 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2016

See all articles by Kate Eugenis

Kate Eugenis

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Rebecca D. Gill

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Date Written: March 30, 2016

Abstract

There is a good deal of evidence that planned media exposure influences outcomes in judicial elections via campaign spending and paid campaign advertisements. However, less well understood is the influence of unplanned media exposure of the sort that happens spontaneously in the news media. Here, we investigate the proposition that unplanned media exposure can influence both the emergence of challengers and the outcome of contested judicial elections. Using data from 282 state supreme court elections in 22 states from 2000-2012, we use two-stage selection models to examine the effect of different types of unplanned newspaper exposure on judicial races. we find, among other things, that unplanned media exposure of the incumbent generally benefits the incumbent. Challengers, on the other hand, have difficulty getting the same level of unplanned media coverage. When they do, the benefits to their campaign are not significant.

Keywords: judicial elections, media and politics, political communication, electoral politics

JEL Classification: D72

Suggested Citation

Eugenis, Kate and Gill, Rebecca D., All Press is Good Press: The News Media and the Incumbent Advantage in Judicial Elections (March 30, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766081 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766081

Kate Eugenis

University of Nevada, Las Vegas ( email )

4505 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States

Rebecca D. Gill (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas ( email )

4505 S. Maryland Pkwy. Box 455029
Las Vegas, NV NV 89154
United States
7028952525 (Phone)
7028951065 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.rebeccagill.net

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
893
Rank
551,205
PlumX Metrics