EU and US Perspectives on Fair Dealing for the Purpose of Parody or Satire

32 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2016 Last revised: 7 Mar 2019

See all articles by Graeme W. Austin

Graeme W. Austin

Victoria University of Wellington

Date Written: August 1, 2016

Abstract

This article concerns the interpretation of the defence of fair dealing ‘for the purpose of parody or satire’, a defence that was added to the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) in 2006. The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) provides no definition of ‘parody or satire’; no cases have considered the meaning of parody or satire in this statutory context; and official sources provide little interpretive guidance on the meaning of these terms. It considers this defence in the light of recent cases from the Court of Justice of the European Union and from the United States. (2016) 39 University of New South Wales L J 684.

Keywords: Copyright, Parody, Satire, Australia

JEL Classification: K11, K19

Suggested Citation

Austin, Graeme W., EU and US Perspectives on Fair Dealing for the Purpose of Parody or Satire (August 1, 2016). UNSW Law Journal, Volume 39(2), Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 4/2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816779

Graeme W. Austin (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

HOME PAGE: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/about/staff/graeme-austin

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
302
Abstract Views
1,485
Rank
185,123
PlumX Metrics