The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study

Posted: 7 Sep 2001

See all articles by Daniel Treisman

Daniel Treisman

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Why is corruption-defined here as the misuse of public office for private gain-perceived to be more widespread in some countries than others? Different theories associate cross-national variation in the extent of corruption with particular historical and cultural traditions, levels of economic development, political institutions, and government policies. This article analyzes which of various plausible determinants are significantly related to several indexes of "perceived corruption" compiled from business risk surveys for the early-1980s and mid-1990s. It finds support for six arguments. Countries with Protestant traditions, histories of British rule, more developed economies, and (probably) those with high exposure to imports were rated less "corrupt". Federal states were more "corrupt" than unitary ones. While the current degree of democracy was not significant, long exposure to democracy was associated with lower corruption.

Keywords: Corruption, Bribery, Government, Federalism, Democracy

JEL Classification: D72, D73, H11, H77, K42

Suggested Citation

Treisman, Daniel, The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=282092

Daniel Treisman (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science ( email )

405 Hilgard Ave.
3265 Bunche Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472
United States
650-725-8556 (Phone)
650-723-1687 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
5,721
PlumX Metrics