Alternative Methods for Robust Analysis in Event Study Applications

INVESTMENT ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, C.F. Lee, ed., Vol. 8, pp. 109-132, Elsevier Science Ltd., 2001

Posted: 13 Sep 2001

See all articles by Lisa A. Kramer

Lisa A. Kramer

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

A variety of test statistics have been employed in the finance and accounting literatures for the purpose of conducting hypothesis tests in event studies. This paper begins by formally deriving the result that these statistics do not follow their conventionally assumed asymptotic distribution even for large samples of firms. Test statistics exhibit a statistically significant bias to size in practice, a result that I document extensively. This bias arises partially due to commonly observed stock return traits which violate conditions underlying event study methods. In this paper, I develop two alternatives. The first involves a simple normalization of conventional test statistics and allows for the statistics to follow an asymptotic standard normal distribution. The second approach augments the simple normalization with bootstrap resampling. These alternatives demonstrate remarkable robustness to heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, non-normality, and event-period model changes, even in small samples.

Suggested Citation

Kramer, Lisa A., Alternative Methods for Robust Analysis in Event Study Applications. INVESTMENT ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, C.F. Lee, ed., Vol. 8, pp. 109-132, Elsevier Science Ltd., 2001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=283335

Lisa A. Kramer (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management ( email )

105 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6 M5S1S4
Canada
416-978-2496 (Phone)
416-971-3048 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lkramer

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,216
PlumX Metrics