The Cost of Protectionism: Should the Law Favor Producers or Consumers?

30 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2016

See all articles by Robert W. McGee

Robert W. McGee

Fayetteville State University - Department of Accounting

Date Written: 1993

Abstract

There is no doubt that protectionism costs. But it is less clear exactly how much it costs and who pays. And while protectionism results in a deadweight loss — there are more losers than winners — some individuals and groups gain from protectionism. And it is those who stand to gain who have the ear of the legislature, at least for the most part.

Part II of this article provides an overview of protectionism and the costs associated with it. Part III examines the monetary costs of protectionism, with emphasis on the costs of protectionism in the auto, steel, textile and agricultural industries. Part IV discusses the nonmonetary costs associated with protectionism, such as unemployment, reduction in social harmony, reduced choice and rights violations. Part V concludes that protectionism is a bad policy, whether viewed from a utilitarian or rights perspective, and recommends that laws that support protectionism should be repealed because protectionism is not in the public interest.

Keywords: Trade, Free Trade, Protectionism, Tariffs, Quotas, Antidumping, Ethics, Utilitarian, Rights

JEL Classification: D63, D72, F1, L61, L62, L66

Suggested Citation

McGee, Robert W., The Cost of Protectionism: Should the Law Favor Producers or Consumers? (1993). Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1993, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2858509

Robert W. McGee (Contact Author)

Fayetteville State University - Department of Accounting ( email )

Fayetteville, NC 28301
United States

HOME PAGE: http://robertwmcgee.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
552
Rank
404,654
PlumX Metrics