Some Ethical Questions for Attorneys Who Initiate Antidumping Actions

Commentaries on Law & Public Policy 1: 170-177 (1997)

8 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2016

See all articles by Robert W. McGee

Robert W. McGee

Fayetteville State University - Department of Accounting

Date Written: 1997

Abstract

The antidumping laws are structurally protectionist. There is no way to construct an antidumping law that is not protectionist. Basically, antidumping laws protect domestic producers at the expense of the general public. They provide a legal means of destroying the property of foreign competitors and making them less able to compete in domestic markets. There are a number of ethical questions that need to be explored in this area. Yet an extensive review of the ethical, economic and legal literature failed to find a single article (with one exception) that addressed these ethical issues. The present paper aims to correct this deficiency in the literature. The paper concludes that an attorney who helps a client initiate an antidumping action is always engaging in unethical conduct.

Keywords: antidumping, ethics, legal ethics, protectionism, rent seeking

JEL Classification: F1, F13, F6, D63, D72, F52, O24, O51, P14

Suggested Citation

McGee, Robert W., Some Ethical Questions for Attorneys Who Initiate Antidumping Actions (1997). Commentaries on Law & Public Policy 1: 170-177 (1997), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2859283

Robert W. McGee (Contact Author)

Fayetteville State University - Department of Accounting ( email )

Fayetteville, NC 28301
United States

HOME PAGE: http://robertwmcgee.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
364
PlumX Metrics