Cultural Logic or Transcendental Interpretation? Golumbia on Chomsky's Computationalism

21 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2016

Date Written: October 31, 2016

Abstract

In The Cultural Logic of Computation David Golumbia offers a critique of Chomsky and of computational linguistics that is rendered moot by his poor understanding of those ideas. He fails to understand and appreciate the distinction between the abstract theory of computation and real computation, such as that involved in machine translation; he confuses the Chomsky hierarchy of language types with hierarchical social organization; he misperceives the conceptual value of computation as a way of thinking about the mind; he ignores the standard account of the defunding of machine translation in the 1960s (it wasn’t working) in favor of obscure political speculations; he offers casual remarks about the demographics of linguistics without any evidence, thus betraying his ideological preconceptions; and he seems to hold a view of analog phenomena that is at odds with the analog/digital distinction as it is used in linguistics, computation, and the cognitive sciences.

Keywords: cultural criticism, media, computing, critique, computationalism, Chomsky, linguistics

Suggested Citation

Benzon, William L., Cultural Logic or Transcendental Interpretation? Golumbia on Chomsky's Computationalism (October 31, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862006 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2862006

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
62
Abstract Views
799
Rank
637,872
PlumX Metrics