Remembering Rollett and Debunking Shapiro (Again)

Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Website (Research and Discussion of the Shakespeare Authorship Question), July 13, 2016

Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2899575

12 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2017 Last revised: 19 Aug 2018

Date Written: July 13, 2016

Abstract

Columbia University Professor James Shapiro, an acknowledged expert on Shakespeare, has made a number of mistaken and misleading claims over the years about the Shakespeare authorship question (SAQ). This pattern continued in comments he made to the New York Times that were paraphrased in a June 2016 article about newly studied documents relating to the coat-of-arms obtained by William Shakspere of Stratford-upon-Avon (1564-1616), the traditionally credited author of the works published under the name "William Shakespeare."

This essay compares Professor Shapiro's questionable contributions to the SAQ (along with those of Professors Stephen Greenblatt and Stanley Wells) to the studies of the late Dr. John M. Rollett, a British scientist and respected independent scholar of the SAQ. The essay concludes that independent scholars (even though sometimes derided as "amateurs") have sometimes adhered better to reliable standards of scholarship than credentialed and tenured academics who are supposed "experts" in their fields.

Keywords: William Shakespeare, authorship question, Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, James Shapiro, John Rollett, Stephen Greenblatt, Stanley Wells

Suggested Citation

Wildenthal, Bryan H., Remembering Rollett and Debunking Shapiro (Again) (July 13, 2016). Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Website (Research and Discussion of the Shakespeare Authorship Question), July 13, 2016, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2899575, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2899575

Bryan H. Wildenthal (Contact Author)

Thomas Jefferson School of Law ( email )

701 B Street
Suite 110
San Diego, CA 92101
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
649
Rank
438,854
PlumX Metrics