Evaluating the Persistence and Structuralist Theories of Unemployment from a Nonlinear Perspective
39 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2001 Last revised: 27 Nov 2023
There are 2 versions of this paper
Evaluating the Persistence and Structuralist Theories of Unemployment from a Nonlinear Perspective
Evaluating the Persistence and Structuralist Theories of Unemployment from a Nonlinear Perspective
Date Written: November 1, 2001
Abstract
This paper assesses empirically two competing accounts of high unemployment, the structuralist and persistence theories. It identifies one structural break in UK and German unemployment around 1980 which is more severe in both absolute and relative terms than that for the US in 1973. This offers support for the structuralist theory. A nonlinear, momentum-TAR model is used to capture fast-up, slow-down unemployment dynamics. Impulse response functions suggest that the half-lives of shocks are longer in the post-break subsamples, especially in Europe, which places the persistence theory closer to the mark. We conclude that elements from both theories are needed for an adequate account of unemployment dynamics.
Keywords: Business cycle asymmetries, structural break, hysteresis
JEL Classification: C22, E30, J60
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Testing of Seasonal Fractional Integration in UK and Japanese Consumption and Income
-
Non-Linearities and Fractional Integration in the Us Unemployment Rate
-
Modelling Structural Breaks in the Us, UK and Japanese Unemployment Rates