The Direct Examination Blueprint: Nine Empirically Supported Principles for Maximum Attention, Retention, and Comprehension

47 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2017 Last revised: 20 Jan 2019

See all articles by Harry M. Caldwell

Harry M. Caldwell

Pepperdine University - Rick J. Caruso School of Law

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

There are nine principles trial lawyers should bear in mind in preparing, choreographing, and executing direct examinations. They are (1) using a conversational tone; (2) blocking or segmenting the examination; (3) headlining each block or segment; (4) staging or choreographing the various blocks; (5) personalizing the witness; (6) freeze-framing critical information; (7) eliciting appropriate feelings; (8) introducing visual reinforcement; and (9) mitigating damaging evidence by pricking boils. The discussion of each principle is followed by empirical data supporting that principle.

Keywords: advocacy, trial advocacy

Suggested Citation

Caldwell, Harry M., The Direct Examination Blueprint: Nine Empirically Supported Principles for Maximum Attention, Retention, and Comprehension (2017). 41 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 141, Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017/6, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2926521

Harry M. Caldwell (Contact Author)

Pepperdine University - Rick J. Caruso School of Law ( email )

24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
806
Rank
330,110
PlumX Metrics