Observations on International Labor Standards and Trade
44 Pages Posted: 3 May 1998 Last revised: 23 Nov 2022
Date Written: June 1996
Abstract
This paper reviews the theoretical arguments for and against linking international labor standards to trade. Based on theory alone it is difficult to generalize about the effect of labor standards on efficiency and equity. Some economists have argued that international labor standards are merely disguised protectionism. An evaluation of determinants of support for legislation that would ban imports to the United States of goods made with child labor provides little support for the prevailing political economy view. In particular, members of Congress representing districts with relatively many unskilled workers, who are most likely to compete with child labor, are less likely to support a ban on imports made with child labor. Another finding is that the prevalence of child labor declines sharply with national income. Last, an analysis of compulsory schooling laws, which are often suggested as an alternative to prohibiting child labor, finds a tremendous amount of noncompliance in developing nations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards
By Kaushik Basu
-
Should Core Labor Standards Be Imposed Through International Trade Policy?
-
Illegal Child Labor in the United States: Prevalence and Characteristics
By Douglas L. Kruse and Douglas Mahony
-
Labor and the Emerging World Economy
By David E. Bloom and Adi Brender
-
By Kaushik Basu
-
Coffee Production Effects on Child Labor and Schooling in Rural Brazil
-
Children's Working Hours and School Enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and Nicaragua
-
Inequality, Productivity and Child Labor: Theory and Evidence