How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
22 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2002 Last revised: 19 Nov 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
Date Written: August 2002
Abstract
Although tax arbitrage is central to the literatures on tax capitalization, implicit taxes, and even capital structure, there is little empirical evidence of the extent to which firms actually engage in tax arbitrage. This paper provides some evidence on the topic by focusing on a simple and observable corporate arbitrage strategy in the market for municipal bonds. It poses a puzzle for the literature, however, in that we find little evidence of municipal bond tax arbitrage by non-financial corporations. The overwhelming majority of firms are not engaging in the arbitrage at all and even among those engaged in arbitrage, many firms do less than a safe-harbor amount allowed by the tax authorities. Such a pattern is consistent with the presence of both fixed and marginal (i.e., that depend on size of the position) costs of arbitrage, though we cannot observe what those costs are.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A General Equilibrium Simulation Study of Subsidies to Municipal Expenditures
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
An Empirical Examination of Municipal Financial Policy
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
By Merle Erickson, Austan Goolsbee, ...
-
The Role of Federal Taxation in the Supply of Municipal Bonds: Evidence from Municipal Governments
-
The Supply Elasticity of Tax-Exempt Bonds
By David Joulfaian and Thornton Matheson