The Myth of State Competition in Corporate Law
72 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2003
Abstract
This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that states compete for incorporations. Delaware aside, no state stands to gain meaningful tax revenues or legal business from chartering firms, and no state takes significant steps to attract incorporations. The explanation for this apathy lies in a combination of economic entry barriers and political factors. This analysis of the market for incorporations has implications for the present structure of corporate law, for the desirability of federal intervention, and for theories of regulatory competition in general.
Keywords: Delaware, Incorporation, Corporate Charters, Corporate Governance, Regulatory Competition, Managers, Shareholders, Takeovers, Barriers to Entry, Network Externalities, Federalism, Legislation, Public Choice, Political Economy, Franchise Tax
JEL Classification: G30, G38, H70, K22, H25, H71, H73, L13, R58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Corporate Governance and Equity Prices
By Paul A. Gompers, Joy L. Ishii, ...
-
What Matters in Corporate Governance?
By Lucian A. Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, ...
-
Governance Mechanisms and Equity Prices
By Martijn Cremers and Vinay B. Nair
-
Did New Regulations Target the Relevant Corporate Governance Attributes?
By Reena Aggarwal and Rohan Williamson
-
Governance Mechanisms and Bond Prices
By Martijn Cremers, Vinay B. Nair, ...
-
Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the U.S.: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
-
Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the U.S.: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
-
The Costs of Entrenched Boards
By Lucian A. Bebchuk and Alma Cohen