Are Output Fluctuations Transitory?
29 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2004 Last revised: 28 Sep 2022
Date Written: May 1986
Abstract
According to the conventional view of the business cycle, fluctuations in output represent temporary deviations from trend. The purpose of this paper is to question this conventional view. If fluctuations in output are dominated by temporary deviations from the natural rate of output, then an unexpected change in output today should not substantially change one's forecast of output in, say, ten or twenty years. Our examination of quarterly post-war United States data leads us to be skeptical about this implication. We find that a unexpected change in real GNP of one percent should change one's forecast by over one percent over a long horizon. While it is obviously imprudent to make definitive judgments regarding theories on the basis of one stylized fact alone, we believe that the great persistence of output shocks documented in this paper is an important and often neglected feature of the data that should more widely be used for evaluating theories of economic fluctuations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances
By Olivier J. Blanchard and Danny Quah
-
Sources of Business Cycle Fluctuations
By Matthew D. Shapiro and Mark W. Watson
-
Life-Cycle Models of Consumption: is the Evidence Consistent with the Theory?
By Angus Deaton
-
Permanent and Transitory Components in Macroeconomic Fluctuations
-
By Danny Quah
-
Are Cyclical Fluctuations in Productivity Due More to Supply Shocks or Demand Shocks?
-
Empirical Structural Evidence on Wages, Prices and Employment in the Us
-
Unemployment Hysteresis in the Us and the EU: A Panel Data Approach