Forecasting the Depression: Harvard Versus Yale
40 Pages Posted: 3 May 2004 Last revised: 24 Sep 2022
Date Written: December 1986
Abstract
Was the Depression forecastable? After the Crash, how long did it take contemporary economic forecasters to realize how severe the downturn was going to be? How long should it Have taken them to come to this realization? These questions are addressed by studying the predictions of the Harvard Economic Service and Yale's Irving Fisher during 1929 and the early 1930's. The data assembled by the Harvard and Yale forecasters are subjected to modern statistical analysis to learn whether their verbal pronouncements were consistent with the data. We find that both the Harvard and Yale forecasters were systematically too optimistic, yet nothing in the data suggests that the optimism was unwarranted.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Non-Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression
-
The Gold Standard and the Great Depression
By Barry Eichengreen and Peter Temin
-
By Ben S. Bernanke and Harold James
-
The Macroeconomics of the Great Depression: A Comparative Approach
-
Nominal Wage Stickiness and Aggregate Supply in the Great Depression
By Ben S. Bernanke and Kevin Carey