Electronic vs. Face-to-Face Review: The Effects of Alternative Forms of Review on Auditors' Performance
40 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2003
There are 2 versions of this paper
Electronic vs. Face-to-Face Review: The Effects of Alternative Forms of Review on Auditors' Performance
Date Written: April 20, 2004
Abstract
Due to recent technological advancements such as online workpapers and e-mail, audit firms have alternative methods of workpaper review that they did not have in the past. While audit workpaper preparers typically know they will be reviewed, and the form their review will take, prior research has focused on comparing the judgments of auditors who expect to be reviewed and auditors who expect to remain anonymous. This study examines the effects on preparers of using two different methods of review: face-to-face and electronic review. The study also compares both review groups to a no-review control group. Consistent with the Heuristic-Systematic Model, we find that the method of review affects preparer effectiveness and efficiency. Specifically, preparers anticipating a face-to-face review were more concerned with audit effectiveness, were less efficient at their task, were less likely to be inappropriately influenced by prior year workpapers, and felt more accountable than preparers in both the electronic review and no-review conditions. Interestingly, electronic review preparers generally did not differ from the no-review group. These results may suggest that it is how a review is to be conducted, and not merely the expectation that a review will occur, that affects the decision maker's judgments and perceptions.
Keywords: review process, audit effectiveness, audit efficiency, accountability
JEL Classification: M49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Hun-tong Tan and Alison Kao
-
Are Auditors' Judgments Sufficiently Regressive?
By Edward J. Joyce and Gary C. Biddle
-
Anchoring and Adjustment In Probabilistic Inference in Auditing
By Edward J. Joyce and Gary C. Biddle
-
A Comparative Evaluation of Belief Revision Models in Auditing
By Ganesh Krishnamoorthy, Theodore J. Mock, ...
-
Using Electronic Audit Workpaper Systems in Audit Practice: Task Analysis, Learning, and Resistance
By Jean C. Bedard, Michael Ettredge, ...
-
The Influence of Audit Structure on Auditors' Performance in High and Low Complexity Task Settings
By Iris Stuart and Douglas F. Prawitt
-
The Effect of Stopping Rules on the Evaluation of Audit Evidence