How Costly is it to Ignore Breaks When Forecasting the Direction of a Time Series?
39 Pages Posted: 10 Mar 2003
Date Written: February 2003
Abstract
Empirical evidence suggests that many macroeconomic and financial time series are subject to occasional structural breaks. In this paper we present analytical results quantifying the effects of such breaks on the correlation between the forecast and the realization and on the ability to forecast the sign or direction of a time-series that is subject to breaks. Our results suggest that it can be very costly to ignore breaks. Forecasting approaches that condition on the most recent break are likely to perform better over unconditional approaches that use expanding or rolling estimation windows provided that the break is reasonably large.
Keywords: Sign Prediction, Estimation Window, Structural Breaks
JEL Classification: C22, G10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models
-
Long Swings in the Exchange Rate: are They in the Data and Do Markets Know it?
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
-
Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals: What Do We Learn from Long-Horizon Regressions?
By Lutz Kilian
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
By Yin-wong Cheung, Menzie David Chinn, ...