Why Does Financial Development Matter? The United States from 1900 to 1940
41 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2006 Last revised: 6 Feb 2022
Date Written: March 2003
Abstract
There is a substantial literature arguing that financial development contributes to economic growth. In this paper, we contribute to this literature by examining the effect of state-level banking regulation on financial development and economic growth in the United States from 1900 to 1940. Specifically, we make three contributions. First, drawing on the banking history literature, we carefully control for factors that could confound a causal interpretation of the effect of financial development on growth. Second, drawing on available data for this period, we examine the pathways through which financial development can affect growth; in particular, we examine the impact of these laws on a range of farm, manufacturing, and human capital outcomes. Third, we document that not all forms of financial development have a positive effect on economic growth. In particular indiscriminate lending can negatively impact economic growth.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Financial Dependence and Growth
By Raghuram G. Rajan and Luigi Zingales
-
Stock Markets, Banks, and Growth: Panel Evidence
By Thorsten Beck and Ross Levine
-
Stock Markets, Banks, and Growth: Panel Evidence
By Thorsten Beck and Ross Levine
-
Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth
By Ross Levine and Sara Zervos
-
Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda
By Ross Levine
-
Stock Markets, Banks, and Growth: Correlation or Causality
By Thorsten Beck and Ross Levine
-
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...
-
Finance, Firm Size, and Growth
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...
-
Finance, Firm Size, and Growth
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...
-
Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes
By Ross Levine, Norman Loayza, ...