Location Choice by Households and Polluting Firms: An Evolutionary Approach
GEP Research Paper No. 02/27; CentER Discussion Paper No. 2004-61
34 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2003
Date Written: May 2004
Abstract
This paper examines several policy regimes to deal with the problem that households suffer from environmental damage by firms in the same region. Taxation gives firms and households an incentive to stay away from each other. Laissez faire (compensation) only gives households (firms) an incentive to stay away from firms (households). We employ an evolutionary framework to analyze migration movements in the course of time, since firms and households will not relocate immediately in response to payoff differentials. We find that taxation creates the right incentives to reach a local welfare maximum. However, compensation may lead to a better outcome than taxation.
JEL Classification: Q28, R20, R30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Trade, Growth and the Environment
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Trade, Spatial Separation, and the Environment
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect
By Arik Levinson and M. Scott Taylor
-
International Trade and the Environment: A Framework for Analysis
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis
-
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-Haven Hypothesis
-
Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis
By Josh Ederington and Jenny Minier
-
A Simple Model of Trade, Capital Mobility, and the Environment
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality