Fixing Capital Gains: Symmetry, Consistency and Correctness in the Taxation of Financial Instruments

83 Pages Posted: 26 Nov 1996 Last revised: 23 Sep 2022

See all articles by David F. Bradford

David F. Bradford

Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School; NBER; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Date Written: September 1996

Abstract

A great deal of effort and ingenuity has been addressed to patching holes in the income tax attributable to realization accounting. A classic instance of the problem is the headachescreated by capital gains, whereby the taxpayer can choose to postpone recognition of gain and accelerate recognition of loss (known as cherry picking). The inconsistencies resulting from realization accounting are most pronounced than in the taxation of financial instruments, especially requirements for income measurement rules based on realization that are `linear' in the sense that doubling a person's transactions will double the taxable income, and adding one set of transactions to another will result in the sum of the associated income. Under present realization conventions, the tax law cannot be linear because there would then be no limit on tax arbitrage profit via variations on borrowing with deductible interest and lending tax exempt. To focus on the principles, the paper assumes transactions are costless. In that case, it is shown that to deal with the intertemporal aspect requires virtually universal imputation of taxable interest income to basis. To deal with the risk aspect of the problem (lock-in and cherry picking) requires simply that the effective rate of tax on gains and losses be the same (not necessarily equal to the rate on intertemporal returns). A new method is proposed that satisfies the requirements for linear income measurement. It is shown that the retroactive taxation of gain devised by Alan Auerbach is a special case of the new approach (involving a zero effective rate of tax on gains and losses).

Suggested Citation

Bradford, David F., Fixing Capital Gains: Symmetry, Consistency and Correctness in the Taxation of Financial Instruments (September 1996). NBER Working Paper No. w5754, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4458

David F. Bradford (Contact Author)

Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School ( email )

Department of Economics
Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States
609-258-1856 (Phone)
609-258-2809 (Fax)

NBER

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.CESifo.de