Arbitrage and the Savings Behavior of State Governments
24 Pages Posted: 28 Dec 2006 Last revised: 1 Oct 2022
Date Written: June 1989
Abstract
The federal tax code creates strong incentives for tax arbitrage activity on the part of state governments. This arbitrage activity is illegal and previous research has typically assumed that the constraint against arbitrage activity is binding. This paper explicitly tests this proposition by considering whether financial asset holdings increase as the yield spread between taxable and tax exempt securities rises. Using a data set on 40 state governments over a 7 year period, I find that there is a significant response to changes in the yield spread. One implication of these results is that the Tax Reform Act of 1986 which made even greater efforts to curb arbitrage activity is likely to be ineffective.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A General Equilibrium Simulation Study of Subsidies to Municipal Expenditures
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
An Empirical Examination of Municipal Financial Policy
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
By Merle Erickson, Austan Goolsbee, ...
-
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
By Merle Erickson, Austan Goolsbee, ...
-
The Role of Federal Taxation in the Supply of Municipal Bonds: Evidence from Municipal Governments
-
The Supply Elasticity of Tax-Exempt Bonds
By David Joulfaian and Thornton Matheson