Are All Lotteries Regressive? Evidence from the Powerball

16 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2004

See all articles by Emily F. Oster

Emily F. Oster

University of Chicago - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: January 5, 2004

Abstract

The regressivity of lotteries has become an increasingly important issue in the U.S. as the number of state-run lotteries has increased. Despite this, we still know relatively little about the nature of lottery regressivity. I use a new dataset on Powerball lotto sales to analyze how regressivity varies with jackpot size within a single lotto game. I find that these large-stakes games are significantly less regressive at higher jackpot sizes. An out-of-sample extrapolation of these results suggest that the lottery becomes progressive at a jackpot around $806 million. This suggests that concerns about regressivity might be allayed by concentrating lotto games to produce higher average jackpots.

Keywords: gambling, lottery, tax, regressivity

JEL Classification: D31, D81, H22, H31

Suggested Citation

Oster, Emily F., Are All Lotteries Regressive? Evidence from the Powerball (January 5, 2004). National Tax Journal, June 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=522742

Emily F. Oster (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Department of Economics ( email )

1126 East 59th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
432
Abstract Views
5,101
Rank
124,808
PlumX Metrics