The Sacrifice of Profits in Non-Price Predation

9 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2004

Abstract

The current legal tests for monopolization and abuse of dominance are unsatisfactory. In both the U.S. and the EC, the tests ask whether the dominant firm engaged in exclusionary conduct, a standard that is notoriously vague. But both jurisdictions also offer a more fruitful analytical approach in asking whether the defendant's conduct had legitimate or objective business justifications. In the U.S., this criterion has led defendants and the U.S. antitrust agencies to argue that monopolization requires a sacrifice of short-term profits, at least in certain circumstances. This essay argues that the sacrifice-of-profits test is an appropriate one, but that it should be understood more specifically to ask whether a dominant firm has excluded its competitors from an input and whether the monopolist has sacrificed profits in doing so. Understood in this way, the test is consistent with both U.S. and EC law. Moreover, the essay shows that with this additional specificity, the test is neither as favorable for defendants as its proponents suggest nor as dangerous as its opponents fear.

Suggested Citation

Patterson, Mark R., The Sacrifice of Profits in Non-Price Predation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=524762

Mark R. Patterson (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-7867 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
369
Abstract Views
1,955
Rank
148,038
PlumX Metrics