Market Structure, Commitment, and Treatment Incentives in Health Care
28 Pages Posted: 14 May 2004
Date Written: February 18, 2004
Abstract
People are more distrustful of managed care organizations (MCOs) than traditional health plans, a phenomenon that has become known as managed-care backlash. In a model of the relationship between a patient, insurer, and physician, this paper shows that when the roles of insurer and provider are combined into a single player (as in a staff-model HMO), the equilibrium insurance plan departs from the social optimum, due to the fact that the HMO cannot credibly commit to providing non-least-cost care. In contrast, when the insurer and provider roles are separate, as in fee-for-service insurance, the equilibrium reimbursements for the physician implement the first-best treatment regime at first-best cost. Thus, the relative inability of MCOs to commit to non-least-cost care may account for at least part of managed-care backlash.
Keywords: Economics, Econometric Theory, Microeconomics, Healthcare, Social Policy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Exit, Choice or Loyalty: Patient Driven Competition in Primary Care
By Rosella Levaggi and Lise Rochaix
-
Investment in Hospital Care Technology Under Different Purchasing Rules: A Real Option Approach
By Rosella Levaggi and Michele Moretto
-
Strategic Costs and Preferences Revelation in the Allocation of Resources for Medical Treatments
By Laura Levaggi and Rosella Levaggi
-
Supplier Discretion Over Provision: Theory and an Application to Medical Care
-
It Takes Three to Tango: Soft Budget Constraint and Cream Skimming in the Hospital Care Market
-
Regulation Strategies for Public Service Provision
By Laura Levaggi and Rosella Levaggi