Why Doesn't Asia Have Bigger Bond Markets?

44 Pages Posted: 4 Jul 2004 Last revised: 26 Nov 2022

See all articles by Barry Eichengreen

Barry Eichengreen

University of California, Berkeley; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

Pipat Luengnaruemitchai

International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 2004

Abstract

Asia's underdeveloped bond markets and dependence on bank finance have been topics of concern since the crisis of 1997-8. In this paper we document that the slow development of Asian bond markets is a phenomenon with multiple dimensions. Larger country size, stronger institutions, less volatile exchange rates, and more competitive banking sectors tend to be positively associated with bond market capitalization. Asian countries' strong fiscal balances, while admirable on other grounds, have not been conducive to the growth of government bond markets. The results suggest that the region's structural characteristics and macroeconomic and financial policies account fully for differences in bond market development between Asia and the rest of the world. Once one controls for these characteristics and policies, in other words, there is no residual Asia effect.'

Suggested Citation

Eichengreen, Barry and Luengnaruemitchai, Pipat, Why Doesn't Asia Have Bigger Bond Markets? (June 2004). NBER Working Paper No. w10576, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=559226

Barry Eichengreen (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Pipat Luengnaruemitchai

International Monetary Fund (IMF) ( email )

700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States
202-623-9733 (Phone)