Thinking About Tax
40 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2004
Date Written: July 16, 2004
Abstract
Behavioral economics and cognitive psychology have demonstrated that people deviate from ideal precepts of rationality in many settings, showing inconsistent judgment in the face of framing and other formal manipulations of the presentation of problems. This article summarizes the finding of original experiments about subjects' perceptions of aspects of tax-law design and argues for the relevance of behavioral perspectives to the understanding and improvement of real-world fiscal systems. We show that in evaluating tax systems, subjects are vulnerable to a wide range of heuristics and biases, leading to inconsistent judgment and evaluation. The prevalence of these biases suggests that there is room for skillful politicians to manipulate public opinion, and that tax-system design can be volatile on account of the possibility of eliciting preference reversals through purely formal rhetorical means. More troubling, the findings suggest a likely and persistent wedge between observed and optimal public finance systems.
JEL Classification: A12, H20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Distribution of Payroll and Income Tax Burdens, 1979-1999
By Andrew Mitrusi and James M. Poterba
-
The Humpty Dumpty Blues: Disaggregation Bias in the Evaluation Of Tax Systems
-
Statistical, Identifiable and Iconic Victims and Perpetrators
By George Loewenstein, Deborah Small, ...
-
Framing and Taxation: Evaluation of Tax Policies Involving Household Composition
-
Tax Policy Design in the Presence of Social Preferences: Some Experimental Evidence
By Lucy F. Ackert, Jorge Martinez-vazquez, ...