Creating Incentives for Private Infrastructure Companies to Become More Efficient

42 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

See all articles by Ian Alexander

Ian Alexander

World Bank

Colin Mayer

University of Oxford - Said Business School; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Date Written: March 1997

Abstract

Certain factors can maximize the pressure on privatized infrastructure companies to be more efficient: the threat of bankruptcy, internal controls imposed by shareholders, and external disciplines (such as the threat of hostile takeover).

The privatization of infrastructure companies is expected to bring about gains for customers by increasing the efficiency of the privatized company. Because many infrastructure industries are not competitive, attention has focused on the development of regulatory regimes that replicate the operation of competitive markets and so lead to the efficiency gains. Less attention, however, has been paid to other institutional factors that encourage firms to operate efficiently.

Alexander and Mayer study three institutional factors that can, in general, encourage efficiency: ° The threat of bankruptcy. ° Internal controls brought about by executive remuneration schemes and the ability of shareholders to remove underperforming management. ° External disciplines brought about by the operation of the market for corporate control and the threat of hostile takeover.

Applying these three aspects of corporate governance to monopolistic infrastructure firms is not simple. Infrastructure regulation may allow privatized firms to avoid financial problems by raising prices, for example, thus sheltering them from the threat of bankruptcy. And shareholder control may be hindered by restrictions on the proportion of the shares that can be owned by any one shareholder.

Alexander and Mayer offer examples of the ways in which different regulatory, institutional, and governance systems work in different countries, especially in relation to infrastructure companies and provide a checklist of options that should be considered when designing the involvement of the private sector in infrastructure position.

This paper - a product of the Private Participation in Infrastructure Group, Private Sector Development Department - is part of a larger effort in the department to analyze issues relating to private participation in infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

Alexander, Ian and Mayer, Colin, Creating Incentives for Private Infrastructure Companies to Become More Efficient (March 1997). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=604948

Ian Alexander

World Bank

1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Colin Mayer (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Said Business School ( email )

Park End Street
Oxford, OX1 1HP
Great Britain
+44 1865 288112 (Phone)
+44 1865 288805 (Fax)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium

HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
1,399
Rank
407,300
PlumX Metrics