Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 49, p. 6, 2005
24 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2004 Last revised: 20 Feb 2015
Date Written: May 1, 2005
Abstract
After the non-binding Universal Declaration of Human Rights, many global and regional human rights treaties have been concluded. Critics argue that these are unlikely to have made any actual difference in reality. Others contend that international regimes can improve respect for human rights in state parties, particularly in more democratic countries or countries with a strong civil society devoted to human rights and with transnational links. Our findings suggest that rarely does treaty ratification have unconditional effects on human rights. Instead, improvement in human rights is typically more likely the more democratic the country or the more international non-governmental organizations its citizens participate in. Conversely, in very autocratic regimes with weak civil society, ratification can be expected to have no effect and is sometimes even associated with more rights violation.
Keywords: human rights, treaty, regime, ratification, democracy, civil society
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law
By Ryan Goodman and Derek Jinks
-
Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law
-
What Can the Rule of Law Variable Tell Us About Rule of Law Reforms?
-
Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties
By Derek Jinks and Ryan Goodman
-
Qualified Ratification: Explaining Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties