Designing Global Climate Policy: Efficient Markets vs. Political Markets

Center for the Study of American Business Policy Study No. 143

60 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 1998

Date Written: December 1997

Abstract

This paper addresses the choice of regulatory instrument for international control of global climate change. First, it examines the efficiency attributes of options including harmonized policy measures, international emissions taxes, and quantitative emissions reductions with internationally tradeable allowances. The paper argues that in the international context of voluntary assent, regulatory instruments not only must promote cost-effectiveness, but also must be designed to attract participation in the cooperative regime and to prevent emissions leakage. The paper suggests that a system of international allowance trading could best fulfill these objectives in concert.

Second, the paper addresses the international politics of climate policy. Individual countries and interest groups may favor globally inefficient policy in order to capture parochial rents. The interests arrayed against international allowance trading may include, among others, environmentalists who favor a high-cost policy on moral or social engineering grounds, and industrialized countries who would benefit from a high-cost policy that hurts them a little while it much more substantially raises their trade rivals' costs. Thus, global climate policy may confront a coalition of environmental baptists and predatory bootleggers. Meanwhile, some developing country diplomats may oppose international allowance trading because they feel their political status at home threatened by the empowerment of markets and the growth of the merchant class. Efficient global climate policy therefore requires both the selection of an efficient regulatory instrument and the cultivation of a political coalition for efficiency.

JEL Classification: F02, K32, K33, L51, Q00

Suggested Citation

Wiener, Jonathan Baert, Designing Global Climate Policy: Efficient Markets vs. Political Markets (December 1997). Center for the Study of American Business Policy Study No. 143, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=61189 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.61189

Jonathan Baert Wiener (Contact Author)

Duke University ( email )

Box 90360
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7054 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.duke.edu/fac/wiener/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
365
Abstract Views
2,109
Rank
149,786
PlumX Metrics