What You Don't See Can't Hurt You: An Economic Analysis of Morality Laws
27 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2004
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
This paper provides an efficiency explanation for laws regulating sex, drugs and gambling. The argument is motivated by the observation that the design of these laws often promotes discretion by the people engaging in such activities. We propose that morality laws can be best explained by considering the proscribed activities to impose a negative externality on others when the activity is observed. In such a case, efficiency requires discretion on behalf of the individual who engages in such activities. Since discretion is often difficult to regulate, the activities are instead proscribed thereby giving individuals incentive to hide their actions from others. In addition, since some level of activity is efficient, the optimal sanctions are not maximal.
Keywords: Crime, externality, law and economics, morality, enforcement
JEL Classification: K42, K32, H32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Optimal Tradeoff between the Probability and Magnitude of Fines
-
Optimal Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting of Behavior
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment When Wealth is Unobservable
-
The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment When Wealth is Unobservable