On the Utility Consistency of Poverty Lines
40 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: October 2003
Abstract
Although poverty lines are widely used as deflators for intergroup welfare comparisons, their internal consistency is rarely given close scrutiny. A priori considerations suggest that commonly used methods cannot be relied on to yield poverty lines that are consistent in terms of utility, or for capabilities more generally. The theory of revealed preference offers testable implications of utility consistency for "poverty baskets" under homogeneous preferences. A case study of Russia's official poverty lines reveals numerous violations of revealed preference criteria - violations that are not solely attributable to heterogeneity in preferences associated with climatic differences.
This paper - a product of the Poverty Team, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to improve poverty measurement methodology.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ed Diener
-
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Culture and Subjective Well-Being
By William Tov and Ed Diener
-
A Note on Unhappiness and Unemployment Duration
By Andrew Clark
-
Happiness, Economy and Institutions
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress
By Ed Diener, Eunkook Suh, ...
-
Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?
By Alberto F. Alesina, Rafael Di Tella, ...