Cardozo and Posner: A Study in Contracts

89 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2005

See all articles by Lawrence A. Cunningham

Lawrence A. Cunningham

George Washington University; Quality Shareholders Group; Mayer Brown

Date Written: January 1995

Abstract

This article critically evaluates the major judicial opinions on the law of contracts written by Judges Benjamin N. Cardozo and Richard A. Posner. Respectively, these judges are the first and third most influential judges on the subject measured by the frequency with which contemporary contracts casebooks reproduce their opinions. Exploring dozens of classic opinions of these judicial titans, the piece contrasts the philosophies and methods the two judges employ in wrestling with many fundamental challenges in contract law, from formation to performance to damages. The inquiry suggests that, using Isaiah Berlin's nomenclature, Judge Cardozo is the fox of American contract law while Posner is its hedgehog. Judge Cardozo displayed the thickly-textured doctrinalist, an optimizer of competing objectives; Judge Posner is a maximizer. (Accompanying tables report data on the contributions of the 15 most influential judges contributing to contract law.)

Keywords: judicial reputation, contracts casebooks, Allegheny College, Lucy Lady Duff Gordon, DeCicco, Sun Printing, Lake River, Wisconsin Knife, Morin, Selmer, good faith, commercial certainty, intention, freedom of contract, liquidated damages

Suggested Citation

Cunningham, Lawrence A., Cardozo and Posner: A Study in Contracts (January 1995). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=678761

Lawrence A. Cunningham (Contact Author)

George Washington University ( email )

Quality Shareholders Group ( email )

HOME PAGE: http://https://qualityshareholdersgroup.com/

Mayer Brown ( email )

HOME PAGE: http://mayerbrown.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,014
Abstract Views
11,424
Rank
41,178
PlumX Metrics