Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No.2, pp. 539-550, June 1998

Posted: 22 Mar 2005 Last revised: 20 Jan 2015

See all articles by Andrew B. Whitford

Andrew B. Whitford

University of Georgia - Department of Public Administration and Policy

Jeff Yates

Binghamton University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: 1998

Abstract

In this study, we build upon the work of Ducat and Dudley's 1989 examination of presidential power and the federal judiciary. Whereas they focused upon presidential fortunes before the federal district courts in cases involving the formal constitutional and statutory powers of the president, we apply a similar model to the voting records of United States Supreme Court Justices in such presidential power cases. Additionally, we offer an extended model of justice voting on presidential power cases that we believe affords a better explanation of the decision-making process. We find that justices' decisions to support the president are conditioned upon presidents' public approval ratings and the justices' ideological inclinations. We also find that presidents receive more voting support in cases involving foreign policy and military affairs than in domestic/nonmilitary cases, thus, lending support to the two presidencies thesis.

Keywords: President, supreme court, ideology, presidential approval, foreign policy, constitutional

Suggested Citation

Whitford, Andrew B. and Yates, Jeff L., Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court (1998). Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No.2, pp. 539-550, June 1998, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=680563

Andrew B. Whitford

University of Georgia - Department of Public Administration and Policy ( email )

Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-542-2898 (Phone)
706-583-0610 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://andrewwhitford.com

Jeff L. Yates (Contact Author)

Binghamton University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Binghamton, NY 13902
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,336
PlumX Metrics