Deterrence of a Criminal Team: How to Rely on its Members' Shortcomings?

Journal of Applied Economic Science, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2009

Posted: 9 Apr 2005 Last revised: 4 Nov 2009

See all articles by Eric Langlais

Eric Langlais

EconomiX, CNRS & University of Paris Ouest

Date Written: November 3, 2008

Abstract

In this paper, we modelize a criminal organization as an agency where the Principal and the Agent have different sensibilities towards the risk of arrestation and punishment, and at the same time have different skills with respect to general organization tasks, crime realization or detection avoidance activities (i.e. allowing to reduce the probability of detection). In this set up, we first compare two regimes of exclusive sanctions (either the sanctions are borne by the Principal/beneficiary of the crime, or they are borne by the Agent/perpetrator of the crime), and we analyze the comparative efficiency of the various instruments which are at the disposal of public authorities to prevent corporation in criminal activities (frequency of control and level of monetary penalties). Finally, we study a case with joint liability.

Keywords: Corporate criminality, strict liability, delegated liability, monetary penalties versus detection

JEL Classification: K13, K14

Suggested Citation

Langlais, Eric, Deterrence of a Criminal Team: How to Rely on its Members' Shortcomings? (November 3, 2008). Journal of Applied Economic Science, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=693741

Eric Langlais (Contact Author)

EconomiX, CNRS & University of Paris Ouest ( email )

200 Avenue de la République
Nanterre, 92200
France

HOME PAGE: http://economix.u-paris10.fr/fr/membres/?id=889

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
617
PlumX Metrics