On Perverse and Second-Order Punishment in Public Goods Experiments with Decentralized Sanctioning
Brown University Economics Working Paper No. 2004-12
46 Pages Posted: 18 May 2005
Date Written: 2004
Abstract
The fact that many people take it upon themselves to impose costly punishment on free riders helps to explain why collective action sometimes succeeds despite the prediction of received theory. But while individually imposed sanctions lead to higher contributions in public goods experiments, there is usually little or no net efficiency gain from them, because punishment is costly and at times misdirected. We document the frequency and probable causes of punishment of high contributors in several recent studies, and we report a new experiment which shows that introducing higher-order punishment opportunities offer a partial solution to the problem, but also reveal the deep-seatedness of retaliatory tendencies.
Keywords: Public goods, collective action, experiment, punishment, demand
JEL Classification: C91, H41, D71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Driving Forces of Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods
-
Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Good Experiments
By Urs Fischbacher and Simon Gaechter
-
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation
By James Andreoni, William T. Harbaugh, ...